N.Y. Times Drone Article

Oct. 7, 2001

Here's the dailykos essay that gives the background to the email questionnaire I sent. This has resulted in two corrections, including the most misleading, the caption to the photo of the model, saying a "real one" was given to the suspect" I'm told by the reporter that this correction is being made, although it has been done so as of Friday.

--------------------
Man Is Held in a Plan to Bomb Washington
By ABBY GOODNOUGH
Published: September 28, 2011


BOSTON — A 26-year-old man from a town west of Boston was charged Wednesday with plotting to blow up the Pentagon and the United States Capitol using remote-controlled aircraft filled with plastic explosives.

Photo of model airplane with this caption on side of article
U.S. Department of Justice, via Reuters

A model of an F-86 drone, a real version of which was reportedly given to the suspect.


The suspect, Rezwan Ferdaus of Ashland, is an American citizen and has a physics degree from Northeastern University in Boston, according to an F.B.I. affidavit. Mr. Ferdaus also tried to provide detonation devices, weapons and other resources to Al Qaeda to carry out attacks on American soldiers stationed overseas, law enforcement officials said.

The arrest was the result of an undercover F.B.I. operation that included a cooperating witness with a criminal record, according to Richard DesLauriers, the special agent in charge of the F.B.I. office in Boston. According to the affidavit, Mr. Ferdaus began planning to commit “violent jihad” against the United States in 2010, modifying cellphones to act as detonators and supplying them to undercover agents who he thought were affiliated with Al Qaeda.

His alleged plan to attack the Pentagon — detailed on two thumb drives that he delivered to the undercover agents, the affidavit said — involved using three remote-controlled planes, similar to military drones, guided by GPS equipment.

Mr. Ferdaus went to Washington in May to take photographs of the Pentagon, the Capitol and places in Potomac Park from where he planned to launch the explosives-filled aircraft. According to the affidavit, he described Americans as “enemies of Allah” and told undercover agents that his desire to attack the United States was so strong that “I just can’t stop; there is no other choice for me.”

In what seems an elaborate operation, undercover F.B.I. agents who had been talking to Mr. Ferdaus for months provided him with some of the necessary components for his planned attack, including six assault rifles, three grenades, 25 pounds of C-4 plastic explosives and even an F-86 remote-controlled aircraft. The explosives and guns were provided on Wednesday just before his arrest, law enforcement officials said.

“The public was never in danger from the explosive devices,” Carmen M. Ortiz, the United States attorney in Boston, said in a statement.

Catherine Byrne, a lawyer for Mr. Ferdaus, did not return a call seeking comment. Mr. Ferdaus is charged with attempting to destroy federal government buildings using an explosive, attempting to destroy national defense premises and attempting to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization.

Fightclub Politics

Attack Ads and the Culture of Corruption

From the television ads for the 50th district California congressional election, we learn that Francine Busby, the Democrat candidate encourages child pornography while Brian Bilbray, the Republican, is responsible for people dying from the food supplements. But wait, there are other ads. Here’s one showing Bilbray courageously mounting a Bulldozer to personally push back sewage from Mexico. Here’s another one with Busby describing how she will personally change the culture of corruption in Washington.

Let’s talk about a paradox in national opinion polls. When asked about the performance of congress, less than 25% are satisfied. Yet when asked about their own member of congress they love him, with approval rate well over 50% Congress is made up of these elected members of congress. They pass the laws, make the rules and define the traditions with absolute autonomy. Yet, voters continue to admire the people who create a product, our laws, or lack thereof, that they abhor. What is going on here?

Just what kind of a system allows public figures to avoid the consequences for the defective quality of their output. The ads that are running on every local station for this election tell the story. You see, once you make a commitment, once you cast your vote for your choice for office, the very process is an affirmation that it is the other guy, the other party, that represents all that is wrong with Congress. Simplify and vilify. It works for grabbing an audience for a B movie, and it works for selecting a candidate with thirty second sound bites.

Readers of this page would prefer a more reasoned process of electing candidates. What is unfortunate is that right now there isn’t one. Because of the prevalence of sound bite campaigns designed for those who buy into it, there is a defensiveness against doing or saying anything that would provide material for these sound bites. This makes actual discussion by candidates about solutions to the real issues that face us impossible.

It is only in the fantasy land of thirty second ads that solutions to actual problems are painless. Years ago, projections were available showing increasing demand for oil from developing countries, while we knew that all of our supplies came from politically vulnerable regions. Our use of oil could only be curtailed by mandated conservation or increasing the cost of petroleum products through selective taxation. Both of these solutions became fodder for sound bite vilification so they were excluded from the political lexicon, unless it was to tar a poor unfortunate who did not get the word. No pain then, but now there is plenty, each time we fill up our tank.

It is the same now with the deficit. There are only two ways to cut it, by reducing expenditures or increasing revenue. Well there is another way, which is when tax cuts stimulate the economy leading to increased tax revenues. But this has limits, or else zero taxation would bring the highest revenues and we would all live happily ever after.

Actually doing either of the two viable choices, raising taxes or decreasing services, would exact a political cost, so they are not done, or even considered. Happy talk replaces the process of making choices. And even if you try to find out what a candidate stands for, it is nearly impossible.

The attack ads run by both major party candidates in this election is an integral part of the pathological partisanship that distorts our national legislature. Since these ads do not give in-depth information about the candidate’s positions, they gain effectiveness by repetition in the most expensive media. The money for these ads come either from special interests, from the left or from the right, who are rewarded by favorable legislation The problem with this type of campaigning is not esthetic. It leads to laws that are as distorted as the depictions of opposition candidates.

A book has just been published entitled, Fightclub Politics, how partisanship is Poisoning the House of Representatives, that begins to describe how far this institution has fallen from the ideal. It will not be fixed by those who are benefiting from the status quo, the entrenched incumbents of both parties and the special interests that feed the divisive campaigns that keep them in power.

Change will only come from an active citizenry who are willing to demand something better .

A Penny’s Value


On one episode of West Wing it was introduced as comic relief; someone was lobbying to get rid of the penny, wasting the valuable time of White House staffers. William Safire wrote a column “Abolish the Penny” last year; pointed, well argued, with a tone of bemusement over thinking that the public would ever take up such a trivial cause.

Yesterday, I was going through the process of trying to turn my small change into real money. I wouldn’t consider dumping it all into the tip box at my favorite coffee shop as it would be insulting, so I decided to distribute the pain. Our banker got a handful. And then I counted out the $2.08 for the copy shop. I had put it on the counter since the clerk was busy. He finished up and we counted it together; and it turned out I was about to stiff him, since what I thought was a quarter was the new nickel.

You see, I knew what a nickel looked like for this last sixty years, and it wasn’t that coin on the left in the picture above. That coin is shiny, with a design I didn’t recognize, so it had to be one of the variants of a quarter. And lying there among the other coins, I didn’t notice it was smaller. I will learn to recognize the new nickel, but there is more mischief ahead. We are about to be challenged with a new dollar coin that will have four different designs each year for the next decade, this while continuing to mint the existing design.

Safire’s article ended on a note of irony, “get out those bumper stickers, “Abolish the penny.” That is not going to happen, and this is why the penny, which is now junk sprinkled among our coinage, will continue to be minted, along with the new “novelty” dollar, imposing a sorting tax of a few extra seconds on every American for every transaction. That’s a lot of seconds.

We shouldn’t need bumper stickers to have a national coinage optimized to achieve its function. This is what we pay our elected officials for, to provide coinage with ease of recognition, security against counterfeiting, and appropriate denominations pegged to purchasing power. Every other advanced country manages to do just this. But rather than make improvements, the rationality of our coinage is being further eroded.

One basic rule is that even the lowest denomination should have a value greater than its transaction cost. A penny, which when first minted got you a newspaper or a child’s smile, now is an insult. A minimum wage worker would be misusing his time to pick one up from the ground.

So as you sort those coins and wait in line at the checkout counter a bit longer, as the job of low paid cashiers gets just a bit more tedious, think about those people whom you elect to federal office. We do not get to look inside the Department of Homeland Security, or really examine how the Defense Department works, but what we do know shows striking similarities with our coinage. Achieving their stated goals are incidental, when there are lobbyists to be appeased, industries to be supported, and connections to be established.

So, I say keep those pennies coming. Each coin, although of little monetary value, provides a priceless symbolic message. Each one illustrates just how little the good of the general public stacks up against the concerted efforts of special interests; and just how far we have to go to get our democracy back.
Pictures, yet!

The blogger--- no photoshop, no artificial lighting, only to be seen until I can get one up that is a little more jolly.



















American enterprise at work.

Just days after the controversy over the renaming of the Encinitas parade hit the newsstand, this entrepreneur designed and produced a commemorative sweat shirt.

Note, in keeping with this parade being named after the American, rather than the Christian, Christmas there are only snowflakes and bulbs illustrating the occasion.

Regional Tennis Center

OpEd article in Union Tribune 2/6/03
Regional Tennis Center

First, last month the Encinitas City Council approved a plan for the new Hall Property Park, with soccer, baseball fields and a world class swimming center.  Then Carlsbad announced its plan for the Alga North Park, also featuring a major aquatic center.  Finally, the Encinitas YMCA announced that they are removing their six tennis courts.  Why?  Mainly to make room for an expanded swimming center. So, while this area will soon be awash in lanes for chlorinated lap swimming, what's happening to tennis?

Tennis is my sport (although some observers might challenge this assertion).  When we moved out here from the east coast, before we even looked at houses we checked out the tennis situation.  The six courts at the Y were the clincher.  They will be gone, so now what?  The three hundred people who signed a petition to save the Y courts over a single weekend are asking the same question.

There are plenty of courts in the area; some in exclusive private clubs, others scattered in public parks and private residential communities.  What is missing is a public tennis center like those in LaJolla and Balboa Park.  These were built on city land with city funds, but now operate at no further cost to the public.  Each has a tennis association, open to all at moderate cost, that pays for all maintenance and runs the programming.  And what programming they have.  Tournaments for all levels and age groups up to 90 year olds, (where just showing up gets you a medal) leagues, mixers and clinics. Pee Wee and junior classes along side of senior games.  Balboa even has a special challenge court, no reservation needed,  just pop in and play.

The key to the success of these centers is the concentration of courts in one location.  There is a minimum number, around ten, that is required to produce special events while maintaining regular weekly programs.  With this activity level, facilities such as rest rooms, food stands and pro shop become self sustaining.  In Manhattan, one such tennis association has fund raisers featuring top tennis pros and world class entertainers. People are eager to volunteer their services and join the association.   

Since this type of center would draw players from the entire region, funding should be equally broad based, perhaps involving several coastal cities and the county.  The Hall property, while planning is still in flux, could be a good setting.  This type of public-private facility has been successful across the country. More than just an amenity, it becomes an attraction that adds luster to its surroundings. Our unique strip of sun kissed paradise deserves nothing less. 

Al Rodbell
Alvrdb-12@yahoo.com

Preview of New America

January 23,2006

While some liberals may applaud the announcement of the decision affirming the state of Oregon's Assisted Suicide Law that allows people in the terminal stages of an illness to receive drugs to end their life, it sends a message that should be deeply disturbing. The Supreme court was two votes away from a different outcome.

Justices John Roberts, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas disagreed with the majority. In his dissent, Scalia wrote: "The court's decision today is perhaps driven by a feeling that the subject of assisted suicide is none of the federal government's business. ... If the term 'legitimate medical purpose' has any meaning, it surely excludes being used to produce death."

The above statement is not part of American jurisprudence or found in the Constitution, but happens to be a central tenet of Roman Catholicism. This is so ingrained in the thinking of Anton Scalia, that for him it was “surely” self evident. His quote is missing the conclusion that follows inexorably, “Only God almighty decides when a person’s time on earth is over.” While written by Scalia, it was endorsed by Thomas and Roberts.

It is a travesty that during John Roberts’ nomination hearing an examination of how he would integrate his religious beliefs with his constitutional responsibilities was off limits. Religious bigotry was not an accusation any Senator was willing to face. Roberts is a man who goes to mass every week to receive the sacraments, predicated on forgiveness for any sin, including that of disobeying the ex cathedra proclamations of the vicar of Christ on matters of faith or morals. Yet no member of the Senate would ask him how he would reconcile these ecclesiastical laws with those of the United States Constitution.

Now we have the answer. In this dissent, shared by two of the court’s other practicing Catholics, the law of God trumped the laws of our country. Of course, this was not the rationale of their dissent that was couched in the arcana of precedent and statute, interpreted contrary to the majority, to achieve their moral and religious ends.

A sovereign state decided that use of drugs for ending life, under carefully defined conditions, was to be allowed. This was decided by the most direct process of democracy, a referendum. Not once, but twice. This law had been in practice for several years, was not subject to misuse and was achieving exactly the effect desired by the people of Oregon. None of this meant a thing to Thomas or Scalia,, and now, we know, to Chief Justice John Roberts.

The words of John Roberts still echo in the Senate hearing room. “Humility, Respect for the law, limits on enumerated authority of the Federal government……“ so many hollow statements, all to be ignored when his personal, religious beliefs were at stake.

Sandra Day O’Connor, who voted with the majority is about to be replaced by Samuel Alito, who talks the same talk, and practices the same faith as the three dissenters. That would leave us a single seat away from a very different court; a five person majority whose decisions just happen to adhere to the strictures of their religion, rather than the laws of their country.

Let us have no more illusions. The same moral-legal calculus of the dissent that justified preventing tormented cancer victims from ending their own lives, will also prevent the ending of the life of a fetus, whether a day, a month or six months from conception. We wonder whether Roe v Wade will be overturned; based on the logic of this dissent, abortion could very well be made a federal crime.

Democratic Senators, along with moderate Republicans, must stand up for their constituents, who are actually the majority of Americans. You now know what confirmation of Samuel Alito, and those who share his values, will mean. If the Senate is put in crisis; if the nuclear option is invoked, then so be it. If not now, when?

Read the dissent. Buried in its tortuous logic is the outline of a new America. Our laws and the institutions that shape a nation, where final authority resides with the people, will have been transformed. Our laws will have a new caveat, “valid unless contrary to the will of God.”

This will have been imposed under the guise of following the very constitution that is being undermined, by men emboldened with the peculiar arrogance only found by those who claim adherence to a standard higher than that of we mere struggling mortals.

The confirmation vote on Samuel Alito will shape this country for decades. If you concur with my evaluation, we must make our sentiments known. Copy, or send link to this essay; talk to friends. An individual Senator can force a cloture vote. Now is the time to take such a stand.

February 2, 2006

There was an attempt to filibuster by Democrats, that was easily defeated, leading to a 57 to 42 confirmation. Just today, on a hopeful note, Alito's first official action as Supreme Court Justice was to side with the moderates to postpone an execution.

Death Penalty cases are the most partisan in the recent history of this court. At one time, according to Edward Lazarus, who was clerking for Blackmun at the time, Scalia and Rhenquist would automatically vote against any action that would have the effect of delaying an execution, while a few Thurgood Marshall and others were so opposed that they would always vote to cause a delay. Neither of these groups looked at the merits of the case.

From this one vote, it looks like Alito, has shown he is not going to join this group. Roberts, however did join Thomas and Scalia. If Bush only got one out of two of his goal of radicalizing the court, I would be delighted. My greatest hope is that the course of events prove the warning of this essay to be wrong.


Description of Oregon Death with Dignity Law

Text of Supreme Court Decision

How Democrats represent majority in Sanate

Incisive article by Justice Scalia on Church and State

Getting a Dog


Chumley

It was an uphill battle for Sheila to get me to break down and get another dog. We both had loved our Westie, Chumley, and were devastated when he finally had to be put down after a long illness. Much had changed in the five years since that day. No longer shuttling back and forth between our Manhattan apartment and our country spread, we had ended up in a suburb of San Diego, Carlsbad, California.

In the country Chumley had seventy acres to romp around, had he the inclination, which he didn’t. Even when he was healthy, he was a stick-at-home type of guy, and could always be found within shouting distance of the porch. Except when he was called to action, joining his pack of Sheila and me in chasing the geese.

We had this pond near the house, and twice a year during migration, Canadian Geese found it a convenient spot to rest, and give birth to their goslings. Sounds delightful, except for one thing, Goose shit. Globs and Glogs of it, on the pier and along the water. So, we really didn’t want the word to get around goosedom, that the Rodbell’s pond is open to the public. We loved nature, but not that much. So, when the geese alighted on the pond, the alarm went out, Goose Alert! The whole team was mobilized, Sheila, Chumley and Me.

This experience has given me a great respect for geese. You see, when they were right in the center of the pond, they were just out of range of my stone throwing ability. So, with an instinctive talent in trigonometry that any junior high school kid would covet, they found that center spot. So, we had to raise one hell of a ruckus to get them to fly away. And it worked, until it didn’t any more.

Now there were goslings, and the geese were parents. They could fly away, but their little babies couldn’t, so they were staying. We weren’t vicious. We had some sympathy for the avian family, but we just wanted them to find another pond. We would have even given them directions.

And this is when I was humbled by a species that you usually think you can outwit. We had herded the family of Geese to one end of the pond, and they knew they were in trouble. One of the parents, can’t tell which one, walked out of the water and started to limp towards the trees a couple dozen feet away. He (or she) seemed to have an injured wing, which was being favored with an awkward gait.

I walked after the injured goose, in an attempt to make sure that he was well chastised and wouldn’t come back, when out of the corner of my eye, I spotted the other big goose, and the half dozen or so goslings, running into the woods. When they had disappeared I returned my focus to the injured Goose, and would you believe it. As soon as his family was safe, he took off. His damaged wing restored.

It had been a ploy to get my attention. Now, in the history of goosedom, rarely have any been pursued by one with as benign intent as mine. This goose was prepared for the worse. He was sacrificing himself for his progeny. So, Geese, the species, is in pretty good shape, and will continue to thrive for some time, I would imagine. Along with goose shit.

Memories of Chumley were like this. He was our companion on cold snowy nights when we all huddled together in front of the fire (really the satellite television, but it’s the same idea.) And when we were in the other extreme of our dual habitat, our 30th floor apartment on Broadway he was also there. There it wasn’t geese, it was in-line skaters who were our nemeses. Chumley didn’t like them and went to grab a bite of their ankle when they went by, which made them jump which they didn’t like. So, I had to try to hold him back, and hold myself back (which I didn’t) when one guy made a really nasty threat when we were along the river that time.

Finding Mitch

But, it was time for a new dog. And over the months Sheila tried to break me down. I really wasn’t ready for the interaction that comes with having a dog. You may never piss in your neighbors yard, but your dog will. And there are those who find this offensive, and want your dog to go in the street. I understand their point of view, but the problem is, a dog doesn’t. And did I really want to be defender of my dog, in this suburb where I certainly did not feel a real part of. I steeled myself against Sheila’s entreaties. But the pressure was being ratcheted up. “Maybe we could just visit the shelter along the highway. You know, Rancho Coastal where my friend in the orchestra used to work.”

It was Sheila’s desire for a pet, against my desire to keep my defenses intact. A few things worked in Sheila’s favor. A few months before I broke down, this little kitten, maybe a few months old, would come into our back yard. There wasn’t any collar, and we both really got attached to it. Then there was a second one. We would feed them, and play with them in our house, and then I sneezed. Once, twice, then incessantly. No way, we were not going to take them in, or any of their species.

And then there was Maggie, Denny’s boxer, who we walked with a few times a week. Maggie was one sweet pooch. And Denny was my pal. So, I confided in him my ambivalence about getting a dog. I said, “There are good things and bad.” And Denny responded, “No, there are only good things.” So, that was it. My resistance broken, we headed to the dog shelters. There were several visits to the ones in the area, where I was ready to take any dog. We even visited the snooty Helen Woodward Kennel in Rancho Santa Fe, where we didn’t quite measure up. They wanted my commitment that even if I were allergic to their dog, I would get treatment rather than return it, which I was not prepared to promise.

Once my defenses were broken there wasn’t much discriminatory skills to bring to bear to the decision. We did pick up some dog breed books to do some research, but it almost gets too confusing. We knew we didn’t want another Westie, since we didn’t want to merge Chumley’s memory with the new one. When had gotten Chumley from a pet shop, it was the same type of indecision. (Possibly a character trait of the writer?) I even managed to get a rare one week return option on that purchase. And, as it was expiring, I was still evaluating my options on whether to return our little bundles of joy. (There were two. Brewster died of a congenital disease at a half year of age)

After a week of looking, we dropped into the Oceanside kennel and walked around. There was this little curly haired guy, turned out to be half poodle, half cocker spaniel, a Cockapoo, who gave us both a wet lick on the nose as we leaned down to say hello. There was another dog that we were somewhat interested in but he was still in quarantine, so it was either this one or nothing. I looked at Sheila; She looked at me. And to seal the deal, the shelter was having an overstock special that week. A sweet fluffy dog, with a poodle fur that doesn’t cause allergies, that gives you a wet kiss, and at a bargain price----“let’s sign the contract,” I said.

At His New House

So, we took him home. It really was a trial period like with Chumley, since they give you a free vet checkup and the opportunity to return him if it doesn’t work out. It seemed kind of strange having this creature here with us. And it must have seemed pretty strange to him too. Our memory was of Chumley, who couldn’t be close enough to us every minute of the day. Mitch, (that was his name and it sounded about right for him, so we kept it) was more aloof. We were told that the people who had him, had to get rid of him because of their health. That was it, no details, no names. The shelters protect both parties of these transactions, so no remorse can be acted on by the giver, and no recriminations expressed for a problem dog by the taker.

We fed him, walked him, played with him, all the doggie things. We got him a little round bed from Costco, that he seemed to find cozy, and we started our life together. We have a little back yard that we let him frolic around, which he seemed to enjoy. A couple days after we had brought him home, it was a Sunday morning, I let him out the in the back yard. I realized something was wrong immediately. The gate had been left ajar the previous day by our gardener, and Mitch had bolted. I dashed out the front door and saw him running down the street, ears flapping, and legs flailing. I ran after him, my plastic slippers flopping as I ran, shouting at the top of my voice, “Mitch, Mitch, Come Mitch, Mitch.” He was faster than me, and getting smaller as he made his first turn. I was tiring, and getting winded, as he flew on. We were on a residential street, but only a few blocks from a busy avenue. I thought about the little chip that was implanted for identification, but first he would have to survive the streets, which seemed like a long shot.

I remembered how it was in the country. There it was pretty common to see dogs walking alone along the road. Sometimes we would stop, but usually we wouldn’t. This was farm country, and a dog was livestock. Well, somewhat more, but too often, not much more. The county was discussing an ordinance to make it a crime to keep driving after hitting a small animal, but nothing to deter the people who let their animals roam.

But as Mitch was disappearing down the street, I thought of the shortness of our time together. Only two days, hardly time to get to know each other. How stupid, how careless of me, not to have checked the gate. And now he would be gone. But the fates had something different in mind. At the far end of the street there was a man walking his two dogs, and that’s where Mitch headed. There he was bouncing off the two dogs, putting them in shock, that they were being swarmed by this little guy who was all paws and licks. Mitch enjoys playing with other dogs with an unrestrained abandon, and there they where, two of them, right there for his enjoyment.

I walked over and picked him up, thanked the owner of the pooches effusively, and carried him the two blocks to the house. What a scare! We would never let that happen again. But we did. A few months later, when I was over at Denny’s, Sheila called in panic. Barely maintaining control, she told me that she had put Mitch out in the yard, but now he was gone. The gates were locked and the fence was intact. What could have happened. Denny jumped in my car and we took Maggie as a Mitch magnet. Ignoring meaningless red lights, I sped to the house.

Well, this time Mitch hadn’t gone far. It turned out that behind the dense high grass along the fence, was a little opening, big enough for him to get his paws into, and make big enough to crawl through, which he did, right to our neighbor‘s yard. Once again he was back in our clutches. I went to Home Depot and hammered in a triple protection of new fence extending well below the ground line. He would need a crow bar to get under this one.

And so it went. He had plenty of long walks where he could play with other dogs, but always on leash. And when we took him to a dog park, we made sure it was only those that had full enclosures, with double air locks that would not allow a dog to get out when someone is getting in. We inspected the back yard fence reinforcement regularly, and developed a standardized protocol of checking that the gate was locked after the yard had been mowed. Mitch was never going to get away again.

A Secure Facility

As the months went by there was always that gnawing doubt: was Mitch happy with us? What had his life been like in his previous home? Would he still wish that he were back there? You can’t ask a dog whether he loves you, or whether he is happy, but it does matter. Was he a part of our family, a major part to us, or was he our prisoner. He was giving us pleasure, but were we giving him the same? We didn’t really know; and the memory of his escape attempts, suggesting an answer we did not like, was always in the background.

Then a few weeks ago we found out about an area near us in Encinitas under a high tension power easement, that had been just dedicated as a dog walk area. It was maybe a half mile long and a block wide of trails and brush. What made it different from any other play area we had taken Mitch to was that it wasn’t enclosed. There was no air lock with latches, just an opening in the fence that you walk through. Now, we knew Mitch was smart. If he had been plotting his escape all of these months, he would have noticed this as we walked in. He would have known that this was his chance to break loose and find those other people, or someplace else that he really liked better. He would have known this, and that he could outrun me any day of the week.

But we had to know. We walked several hundred feet into the area, and then I looked at Sheila, and we agreed. We would take off his leash. I reached down, pushed the snap, and he was free. And he turned, and he ran down the trail, his ears flapping in the wind. He ran about a hundred feet or so, and then I called, “Mitch.“ and I waited a long second. He stopped and turned, and started back at the same speed, right past us a few yards, around again, stopping at our feet. He looked up and made eye contact; petted him, scratched him behind the ears, and he was off again.

He ran back and forth, and when he spotted the waging tails of some dogs in the distance, he made that sound, not a bark but a sort of ummm, ummm, ummm, that is best interpreted as, “hey, there’s someone to play with.” He wanted to take off toward them, but only would after I had given the O.K. And when he got there, even in the ecstasy of his wild play, he would still be aware of us. And if we called, he would break off, and come. Mitch was just as concerned about losing us as we were of losing him.

It was a joyous day. We went back home together, for the first time feeling like a family. We all wanted to be together. It wouldn’t take treats, or an electronic collar to make him come when we called, it’s just that he wants to be with us. Wow, this is why there are so may dogs around. This is why people in dire straits will buy dog food instead of a meal for themselves. And this is why every so often you read about a person who dies in a freezing lake trying to rescue a dog, sometimes not even their own.

It took some time, but once again, we have a dog---and I guess he has us.



.